<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (9) TMI 168 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The penalty for the addition of Rs. 1,06,837 relating to expenses from an earlier year was upheld, while penalties for other additions were canceled. The dissenting opinion suggested that penalties should not apply when both returned and assessed figures are losses, but the Third Member upheld the penalty imposition. The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with penalties being partly justified and partly canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (9) TMI 168 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income. The penalty for the addition of Rs. 1,06,837 relating to expenses from an earlier year was upheld, while penalties for other additions were canceled. The dissenting opinion suggested that penalties should not apply when both returned and assessed figures are losses, but the Third Member upheld the penalty imposition. The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, with penalties being partly justified and partly canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>