<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 133 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred the question of law regarding the liability of a registered firm to pay penalty under the Income-tax Act to the High Court. The Tribunal acknowledged the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Ganesh Dass Sreeram as prevailing over the Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Jamunadas Munnalal, emphasizing the significance of following the latest judicial pronouncements in resolving legal disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:04:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 133 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred the question of law regarding the liability of a registered firm to pay penalty under the Income-tax Act to the High Court. The Tribunal acknowledged the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Ganesh Dass Sreeram as prevailing over the Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Jamunadas Munnalal, emphasizing the significance of following the latest judicial pronouncements in resolving legal disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>