<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (10) TMI 125 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70986</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that an intimation under section 143(1)(a)(i) does not constitute an &quot;order&quot; for invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent behind the provisions, distinguishing between an intimation and an order. It concluded that the intimation was not intended to be equated with an order for invoking section 263. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the order under section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:40:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (10) TMI 125 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70986</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that an intimation under section 143(1)(a)(i) does not constitute an &quot;order&quot; for invoking section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent behind the provisions, distinguishing between an intimation and an order. It concluded that the intimation was not intended to be equated with an order for invoking section 263. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the order under section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>