<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 280 - ITAT NEW DELHI-F</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the entire salary and bonus received by the assessees, who were Not Ordinarily Residents, were taxable in India as the services rendered outside India were closely connected to their employment in India. The Tribunal found that the salary accrued in India due to the territorial nexus with the country, resulting in the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 280 - ITAT NEW DELHI-F</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the entire salary and bonus received by the assessees, who were Not Ordinarily Residents, were taxable in India as the services rendered outside India were closely connected to their employment in India. The Tribunal found that the salary accrued in India due to the territorial nexus with the country, resulting in the restoration of the Assessing Officer&#039;s orders in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>