<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (6) TMI 62 - ITAT NEW DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the death of a partner resulted in the dissolution of the firm unless there was an agreement among the surviving partners to the contrary. As no such agreement was proven, the firm was deemed dissolved, and two separate assessments were ordered based on the returns filed. The Tribunal determined that the delay in filing the application for registration of the firm was not condonable under section 185(2) and left the matter open for the Income Tax Officer to decide on merits during the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:26:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (6) TMI 62 - ITAT NEW DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the death of a partner resulted in the dissolution of the firm unless there was an agreement among the surviving partners to the contrary. As no such agreement was proven, the firm was deemed dissolved, and two separate assessments were ordered based on the returns filed. The Tribunal determined that the delay in filing the application for registration of the firm was not condonable under section 185(2) and left the matter open for the Income Tax Officer to decide on merits during the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>