<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 171 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70940</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act could not survive where, after effect was given to the Tribunal&#039;s earlier direction, the assessee&#039;s income fell below the taxable limit and no tax remained payable. On that factual basis, there was no obligation to furnish an estimate under section 212(3), so the foundation for levy of penalty disappeared. The related interest levy under section 220(2) had also been cancelled on the same basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 171 - ITAT DELHI-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70940</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 273(b) of the Income-tax Act could not survive where, after effect was given to the Tribunal&#039;s earlier direction, the assessee&#039;s income fell below the taxable limit and no tax remained payable. On that factual basis, there was no obligation to furnish an estimate under section 212(3), so the foundation for levy of penalty disappeared. The related interest levy under section 220(2) had also been cancelled on the same basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>