<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 315 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70908</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete Rs. 8,50,000 and Rs. 11,111 from the assessee&#039;s income. It ruled that the funds in the joint account belonged to Mrs. Yojana, supported by credible evidence and affidavits. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that further inquiry should focus on Mrs. Yojana, not the assessee, based on the evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:10:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 315 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70908</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete Rs. 8,50,000 and Rs. 11,111 from the assessee&#039;s income. It ruled that the funds in the joint account belonged to Mrs. Yojana, supported by credible evidence and affidavits. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that further inquiry should focus on Mrs. Yojana, not the assessee, based on the evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>