<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 290 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70898</link>
    <description>In block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, a disallowance under section 40A(3) was treated as outside the scope of undisclosed income where the underlying purchases were already recorded in the regular books. The Tribunal also accepted the first appellate finding on the quantified undisclosed income, holding the adopted figure to be correct on the facts. On the seized diary entries and the statement under section 132(4), the Tribunal noted that such admissions are not conclusive and may be displaced by a credible retraction and corroborative material; the diary entries, surrounding circumstances, affidavits and VDIS declarations supported the assessee&#039;s explanation, so the addition based on peak cash credits was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:46:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 290 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70898</link>
      <description>In block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, a disallowance under section 40A(3) was treated as outside the scope of undisclosed income where the underlying purchases were already recorded in the regular books. The Tribunal also accepted the first appellate finding on the quantified undisclosed income, holding the adopted figure to be correct on the facts. On the seized diary entries and the statement under section 132(4), the Tribunal noted that such admissions are not conclusive and may be displaced by a credible retraction and corroborative material; the diary entries, surrounding circumstances, affidavits and VDIS declarations supported the assessee&#039;s explanation, so the addition based on peak cash credits was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>