<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 103 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70889</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order levying interest under s. 201(1A) as the assessee, engaged in the liquor business, did not have any liability to pay TDS under s. 201(1A) since no tax was deducted at the source. The Tribunal clarified that s. 201(1A) applies to cases of failure to deduct or pay after deduction, which was not applicable in this case. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the interest under s. 201(1A) was not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:24:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 103 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70889</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order levying interest under s. 201(1A) as the assessee, engaged in the liquor business, did not have any liability to pay TDS under s. 201(1A) since no tax was deducted at the source. The Tribunal clarified that s. 201(1A) applies to cases of failure to deduct or pay after deduction, which was not applicable in this case. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the interest under s. 201(1A) was not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>