<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 163 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, canceling the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, including the right to cross-examination and the necessity of clear evidence for imposing penalties. The Tribunal also recognized the implicit agreement between the assessee and the Department to settle the assessment amicably, further justifying the cancellation of the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:03:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 163 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, canceling the penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, including the right to cross-examination and the necessity of clear evidence for imposing penalties. The Tribunal also recognized the implicit agreement between the assessee and the Department to settle the assessment amicably, further justifying the cancellation of the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>