<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 128 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70868</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal. It upheld the inclusion of the entire movable property as passing on the death of the deceased, as the deceased was deemed the sole surviving coparcener. However, it directed the inclusion of only the 1/3rd share of the value of the immovable properties, as the family remained joint in respect of the same. The valuation of the immovable property at Rs. 2000 per acre was also upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 128 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70868</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal. It upheld the inclusion of the entire movable property as passing on the death of the deceased, as the deceased was deemed the sole surviving coparcener. However, it directed the inclusion of only the 1/3rd share of the value of the immovable properties, as the family remained joint in respect of the same. The valuation of the immovable property at Rs. 2000 per acre was also upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>