<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 169 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70865</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the incentive bonus received by the assessee was not part of the salary but income from the profession, allowing for the deduction of related expenses. The conveyance allowance was exempt under Section 10(14) based on the certificate from LIC. The case was remitted back to the ITO to verify and regulate the deductions for expenses and depreciation, following the Board&#039;s Circular guidelines. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:22:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 169 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70865</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the incentive bonus received by the assessee was not part of the salary but income from the profession, allowing for the deduction of related expenses. The conveyance allowance was exempt under Section 10(14) based on the certificate from LIC. The case was remitted back to the ITO to verify and regulate the deductions for expenses and depreciation, following the Board&#039;s Circular guidelines. The appeal was allowed in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>