<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (12) TMI 163 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70863</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed relief to a partnership firm by directing the disallowance of only the net amount of interest paid to partners under section 40(b) of the IT Act. The Tribunal relied on the Allahabad High Court decisions, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the gross amount of interest should be disallowed. The firm&#039;s appeal was allowed, resulting in relief of Rs. 3,777, based on the interpretation of section 40(b) and relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 17:19:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (12) TMI 163 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70863</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed relief to a partnership firm by directing the disallowance of only the net amount of interest paid to partners under section 40(b) of the IT Act. The Tribunal relied on the Allahabad High Court decisions, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the gross amount of interest should be disallowed. The firm&#039;s appeal was allowed, resulting in relief of Rs. 3,777, based on the interpretation of section 40(b) and relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>