<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 281 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under section 271C was unjustified as the assessee acted in good faith, believing the gratuity exemption limit was Rs. 2,50,000. The penalties imposed were deleted due to lack of evidence of mala fide intention. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties under section 271C were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 281 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under section 271C was unjustified as the assessee acted in good faith, believing the gratuity exemption limit was Rs. 2,50,000. The penalties imposed were deleted due to lack of evidence of mala fide intention. The appeals were allowed, and the penalties under section 271C were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>