<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 281 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70848</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271C for alleged short deduction of tax at source on gratuity payments was held unsustainable where the assessee relied on the exemption framework under section 10(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and applied the prescribed ceiling while deducting tax. The Board&#039;s Circular No. 138 of 17-6-1974 recognised gratuity received under section 4(5) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 as falling within the residuary exemption under section 10(10)(iii), subject to the notified limit. As no material showed that the assessee&#039;s estimate was not bona fide or that any short deduction was deliberate or mala fide, penalty was not leviable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:33:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 281 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70848</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271C for alleged short deduction of tax at source on gratuity payments was held unsustainable where the assessee relied on the exemption framework under section 10(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and applied the prescribed ceiling while deducting tax. The Board&#039;s Circular No. 138 of 17-6-1974 recognised gratuity received under section 4(5) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 as falling within the residuary exemption under section 10(10)(iii), subject to the notified limit. As no material showed that the assessee&#039;s estimate was not bona fide or that any short deduction was deliberate or mala fide, penalty was not leviable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>