<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (10) TMI 89 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CWT&#039;s order that invoked s. 25(2) of the WT Act. The Tribunal determined that the house property belonged to the assessee, justified the valuations presented, and excluded income tax refunds from the wealth calculation. Consequently, the Tribunal found the CWT&#039;s decision unwarranted and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (10) TMI 89 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CWT&#039;s order that invoked s. 25(2) of the WT Act. The Tribunal determined that the house property belonged to the assessee, justified the valuations presented, and excluded income tax refunds from the wealth calculation. Consequently, the Tribunal found the CWT&#039;s decision unwarranted and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>