<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 194 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the incentive bonus received should be treated as income from services rendered in a different capacity, allowing for the deduction of 40% of the bonus as expenses incurred for earning it. The Tribunal held that the bonus is not solely part of the salary and emphasized the concept of real income over notional income for taxation purposes. The appeal was allowed, overturning the decision of the CIT (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 194 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the incentive bonus received should be treated as income from services rendered in a different capacity, allowing for the deduction of 40% of the bonus as expenses incurred for earning it. The Tribunal held that the bonus is not solely part of the salary and emphasized the concept of real income over notional income for taxation purposes. The appeal was allowed, overturning the decision of the CIT (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>