<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 110 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of undisclosed income by the Assessing Officer was unjustified. It was determined that the excess stock found during a survey did not fall under the purview of Chapter XIV-B of the Income-tax Act, as it had already been assessed under regular assessment. Therefore, the Rs. 2,00,000 addition was deleted, resulting in the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:02:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 110 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the addition of undisclosed income by the Assessing Officer was unjustified. It was determined that the excess stock found during a survey did not fall under the purview of Chapter XIV-B of the Income-tax Act, as it had already been assessed under regular assessment. Therefore, the Rs. 2,00,000 addition was deleted, resulting in the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>