<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70824</link>
    <description>In a block assessment following search and seizure, the dominant issue was whether undisclosed income could be assessed merely on the ad hoc amount returned in the block return, or at a lower figure later computed on the basis of seized material. The ITAT held that, where group-wide ad hoc disclosure was necessitated by mixed evidence and the assessee later furnished a detailed working showing lower undisclosed income, assessment must reflect &quot;real income&quot; once the working is verified as correct by the AO; the statutory proviso to s. 158BC did not bar such reduction. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to assess undisclosed income at the finally determined lower amount was upheld, and both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70824</link>
      <description>In a block assessment following search and seizure, the dominant issue was whether undisclosed income could be assessed merely on the ad hoc amount returned in the block return, or at a lower figure later computed on the basis of seized material. The ITAT held that, where group-wide ad hoc disclosure was necessitated by mixed evidence and the assessee later furnished a detailed working showing lower undisclosed income, assessment must reflect &quot;real income&quot; once the working is verified as correct by the AO; the statutory proviso to s. 158BC did not bar such reduction. Consequently, the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to assess undisclosed income at the finally determined lower amount was upheld, and both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>