<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70824</link>
    <description>In block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, undisclosed income must be computed from search material and the statutory scheme, not bound by the higher figure originally returned by the assessee. A returned amount is not conclusive, and no estoppel arises against the statute; where verification of the working showed a lower correct figure, assessment at that lower amount was proper. A separate addition for share investment was also unwarranted because the source was explained through withdrawals already reflected in the rough diaries and included in the returned undisclosed income, with no contrary material to displace that explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 263 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70824</link>
      <description>In block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, undisclosed income must be computed from search material and the statutory scheme, not bound by the higher figure originally returned by the assessee. A returned amount is not conclusive, and no estoppel arises against the statute; where verification of the working showed a lower correct figure, assessment at that lower amount was proper. A separate addition for share investment was also unwarranted because the source was explained through withdrawals already reflected in the rough diaries and included in the returned undisclosed income, with no contrary material to displace that explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>