<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 209 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70817</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals regarding penalties imposed on the legal heir under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal held that penalties on the legal representative post the death of the original assessee were not valid as the liability must arise from an order passed during the assessee&#039;s lifetime. Considering the reasonable cause for the delay in filing returns due to the assessee&#039;s detention and externment, the penalties were canceled. The importance of legal provisions and precedents in determining tax liabilities and penalties was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:09:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 209 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70817</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur ruled in favor of the assessee in appeals regarding penalties imposed on the legal heir under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal held that penalties on the legal representative post the death of the original assessee were not valid as the liability must arise from an order passed during the assessee&#039;s lifetime. Considering the reasonable cause for the delay in filing returns due to the assessee&#039;s detention and externment, the penalties were canceled. The importance of legal provisions and precedents in determining tax liabilities and penalties was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>