<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 217 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT (Appeals) cancelling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c), ruling that penalties should not be levied when both returned and assessed figures are losses. The Tribunal found that Explanation 4 could not expand the scope of section 271(1)(c) to cover penalties for reduced losses. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross objection of the assessee were both dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:06:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 217 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT (Appeals) cancelling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c), ruling that penalties should not be levied when both returned and assessed figures are losses. The Tribunal found that Explanation 4 could not expand the scope of section 271(1)(c) to cover penalties for reduced losses. The appeal of the Revenue and the cross objection of the assessee were both dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>