<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 131 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the disallowance of commission paid and the addition due to income discrepancy were not justified as they did not constitute undisclosed income under Chapter XIV-B of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that disclosed income or expenditure cannot be treated as undisclosed income under section 158B, ultimately leading to the deletion of both disputed amounts from the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:14:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 131 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the disallowance of commission paid and the addition due to income discrepancy were not justified as they did not constitute undisclosed income under Chapter XIV-B of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that disclosed income or expenditure cannot be treated as undisclosed income under section 158B, ultimately leading to the deletion of both disputed amounts from the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>