<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 141 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification under section 154 regarding the intimation under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that after the introduction of section 80AB, there was no controversy on how to compute profits and gains for deduction under section 80-I. Considering deductions for depreciation, unabsorbed depreciation, and unabsorbed investment allowance were necessary for computing income under section 80-I. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification was justified based on the incorrect computation of the claimed deduction under section 80-I.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 141 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification under section 154 regarding the intimation under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal determined that after the introduction of section 80AB, there was no controversy on how to compute profits and gains for deduction under section 80-I. Considering deductions for depreciation, unabsorbed depreciation, and unabsorbed investment allowance were necessary for computing income under section 80-I. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer&#039;s rectification was justified based on the incorrect computation of the claimed deduction under section 80-I.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>