https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70775 The Tribunal concluded that the Department's expert opinions lacked detailed reasoning and were insufficient to establish the genuineness of the seized documents. The assessee's experts provided convincing reasons for their conclusions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s decision to delete the additions, rejecting the Department's application under Rule 29. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and disposed of the applications without further cross-examination of the assessee's experts due to the significant lapse of time. en-us Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:46:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70775 The Tribunal concluded that the Department's expert opinions lacked detailed reasoning and were insufficient to establish the genuineness of the seized documents. The assessee's experts provided convincing reasons for their conclusions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s decision to delete the additions, rejecting the Department's application under Rule 29. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and disposed of the applications without further cross-examination of the assessee's experts due to the significant lapse of time. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70775