<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (12) TMI 141 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70753</link>
    <description>An unregistered agreement promising a future transfer of half share in immovable property did not pass any present right or title and, on its construction as a sale in consideration of dower debt, required a registered instrument to be effective. The document therefore failed to transfer ownership to the assessee&#039;s wife, so the entire property continued to belong to the assessee for assessment purposes. The plea based on earlier wealth-tax orders was also rejected because res judicata does not strictly apply in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:43:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (12) TMI 141 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70753</link>
      <description>An unregistered agreement promising a future transfer of half share in immovable property did not pass any present right or title and, on its construction as a sale in consideration of dower debt, required a registered instrument to be effective. The document therefore failed to transfer ownership to the assessee&#039;s wife, so the entire property continued to belong to the assessee for assessment purposes. The plea based on earlier wealth-tax orders was also rejected because res judicata does not strictly apply in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>