<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 236 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70723</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and upheld the AAC&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of the sum paid as damages by the assessee. It clarified the distinction between speculative losses and damages for breach of contract, emphasizing the presence of ready goods and the intention to avoid substantial financial loss as key factors in determining the nature of the transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:46:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 236 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70723</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and upheld the AAC&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of the sum paid as damages by the assessee. It clarified the distinction between speculative losses and damages for breach of contract, emphasizing the presence of ready goods and the intention to avoid substantial financial loss as key factors in determining the nature of the transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>