<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 138 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, holding that the provisions of Section 164 did not apply to the trust under consideration. The Tribunal found that the beneficiaries and their shares were determinate and known, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam&#039;s Family (Remainder Wealth) Trust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 138 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, holding that the provisions of Section 164 did not apply to the trust under consideration. The Tribunal found that the beneficiaries and their shares were determinate and known, following the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam&#039;s Family (Remainder Wealth) Trust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>