<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (10) TMI 36 - ITAT MADURAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70701</link>
    <description>Machinery sold by the assessee was treated as a subsequent sale in the chain, and the relevant statutory scheme made such goods single-point taxable only at the first sale under the First Schedule. On that basis, the later sale could not be assessed to sales tax, so the assessment was unsustainable. Because the penalty was consequential to the failed assessment, it also could not stand independently and had to be cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (10) TMI 36 - ITAT MADURAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70701</link>
      <description>Machinery sold by the assessee was treated as a subsequent sale in the chain, and the relevant statutory scheme made such goods single-point taxable only at the first sale under the First Schedule. On that basis, the later sale could not be assessed to sales tax, so the assessment was unsustainable. Because the penalty was consequential to the failed assessment, it also could not stand independently and had to be cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>