<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 87 - ITAT MADURAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70699</link>
    <description>Packing charges separately collected by the assessee were not includible in taxable turnover under the Central Sales Tax Act because the relevant Government Order exempting such charges was in force for the assessment year. The amended section 8A did not override the exemption available under section 8(5), so denying the exclusion was unsustainable. The analysis also aligned with earlier decisions granting the same relief on identical facts, and the assessee was entitled to exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 87 - ITAT MADURAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70699</link>
      <description>Packing charges separately collected by the assessee were not includible in taxable turnover under the Central Sales Tax Act because the relevant Government Order exempting such charges was in force for the assessment year. The amended section 8A did not override the exemption available under section 8(5), so denying the exclusion was unsustainable. The analysis also aligned with earlier decisions granting the same relief on identical facts, and the assessee was entitled to exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>