<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 177 - ITAT MADRAS-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70698</link>
    <description>Penalty for delayed filing of wealth-tax returns was treated as inapplicable where the assessee became liable only after making a post-search disclosure under a voluntary disclosure scheme. Section 14 of the scheme was understood to extend immunity from penalty to the disclosed income and the assets representing it, including the resulting wealth-tax consequences, so the late filing was protected. Independently, the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief that wealth-tax compliance arose only after the disclosure constituted reasonable cause for the delay. On either basis, the penalty was not exigible and the cancellation of penalties was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:04:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 177 - ITAT MADRAS-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70698</link>
      <description>Penalty for delayed filing of wealth-tax returns was treated as inapplicable where the assessee became liable only after making a post-search disclosure under a voluntary disclosure scheme. Section 14 of the scheme was understood to extend immunity from penalty to the disclosed income and the assets representing it, including the resulting wealth-tax consequences, so the late filing was protected. Independently, the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief that wealth-tax compliance arose only after the disclosure constituted reasonable cause for the delay. On either basis, the penalty was not exigible and the cancellation of penalties was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>