<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 258 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54F of the IT Act for investing capital gains in a new residential house. The denial of exemption was overturned as the property in question was owned by the HUF until a court decision in July 1998, making the assessee eligible for the exemption. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 258 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54F of the IT Act for investing capital gains in a new residential house. The denial of exemption was overturned as the property in question was owned by the HUF until a court decision in July 1998, making the assessee eligible for the exemption. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>