<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 146 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that no penalty was imposable under Section 271B as there was no legislative obligation for the assessee to furnish the audit report within the time stipulated under Section 139(1) for the assessment year 1993-94. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271B was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:12:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 146 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that no penalty was imposable under Section 271B as there was no legislative obligation for the assessee to furnish the audit report within the time stipulated under Section 139(1) for the assessment year 1993-94. Consequently, the penalty imposed under Section 271B was deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>