<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 181 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70645</link>
    <description>Jewellery presented by a mother to her unmarried daughter at marriage was treated as expenditure incidental to the marriage, not a taxable gift. The controlling principle was that a mother&#039;s legal obligation of maintenance under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act extends to reasonable expenses connected with a daughter&#039;s marriage. On the facts, the daughter was unable to maintain herself, the jewellery formed part of the mother&#039;s existing assets, and the value was considered reasonable in the circumstances. The transfer therefore fell outside the Gift-tax Act, and the related aggregation for the later year could not be sustained on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:37:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 181 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70645</link>
      <description>Jewellery presented by a mother to her unmarried daughter at marriage was treated as expenditure incidental to the marriage, not a taxable gift. The controlling principle was that a mother&#039;s legal obligation of maintenance under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act extends to reasonable expenses connected with a daughter&#039;s marriage. On the facts, the daughter was unable to maintain herself, the jewellery formed part of the mother&#039;s existing assets, and the value was considered reasonable in the circumstances. The transfer therefore fell outside the Gift-tax Act, and the related aggregation for the later year could not be sustained on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>