<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 154 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70640</link>
    <description>The appeals were disposed of as follows: Dinakaran and Mahendran (Asst. yr. 1986-87) had their appeals dismissed, Muthu (Asst. yr. 1986-87) had his appeal dismissed, Dinakaran and Mahendran (Asst. yr. 1987-88) had their appeals allowed, Muthu (Asst. yr. 1987-88) had his appeal dismissed, and Asokan (Asst. yr. 1988-89) had his appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:28:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 154 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70640</link>
      <description>The appeals were disposed of as follows: Dinakaran and Mahendran (Asst. yr. 1986-87) had their appeals dismissed, Muthu (Asst. yr. 1986-87) had his appeal dismissed, Dinakaran and Mahendran (Asst. yr. 1987-88) had their appeals allowed, Muthu (Asst. yr. 1987-88) had his appeal dismissed, and Asokan (Asst. yr. 1988-89) had his appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>