<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 210 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the valuation determined by the Assessing Officer was proper and not prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The appeals challenging orders under s. 25(2) of the WT Act, 1957 were allowed, emphasizing the importance of judicial discretion in property valuation assessments and limiting the Commissioner&#039;s authority to revise orders based on subsequent valuation reports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:23:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 210 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the valuation determined by the Assessing Officer was proper and not prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The appeals challenging orders under s. 25(2) of the WT Act, 1957 were allowed, emphasizing the importance of judicial discretion in property valuation assessments and limiting the Commissioner&#039;s authority to revise orders based on subsequent valuation reports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>