<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (8) TMI 147 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70625</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, holding that the status of the assessee trusts remained as individuals, not AOPs, for the assessment year 1980-81. The Tribunal determined that the amendment in s. 164(1) did not change the status previously decided for the trusts with indeterminate beneficiaries. Therefore, the deduction under s. 80L was permissible for the trusts, and the ITO was directed to allow the appropriate deduction for each of the assessee trusts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:43:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (8) TMI 147 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70625</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals, holding that the status of the assessee trusts remained as individuals, not AOPs, for the assessment year 1980-81. The Tribunal determined that the amendment in s. 164(1) did not change the status previously decided for the trusts with indeterminate beneficiaries. Therefore, the deduction under s. 80L was permissible for the trusts, and the ITO was directed to allow the appropriate deduction for each of the assessee trusts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>