<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 190 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the surrender of shares by the assessee during the firm&#039;s reconstitution did not attract gift tax. The Tribunal found that the transaction involved both consideration and adequate consideration, meeting the criteria established by previous court decisions. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the AAC and GTO, concluding that the transaction was not liable for gift tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:39:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 190 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the surrender of shares by the assessee during the firm&#039;s reconstitution did not attract gift tax. The Tribunal found that the transaction involved both consideration and adequate consideration, meeting the criteria established by previous court decisions. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the AAC and GTO, concluding that the transaction was not liable for gift tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>