<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 216 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70601</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and directing a revaluation of the shares for wealth tax assessment in accordance with the law. The Commissioner found the valuation adopted by the assessee to be prejudicial to the interest of revenue and directed the Wealth Tax Officer to revalue the shares. The Tribunal agreed that the Commissioner had valid jurisdiction to order the revaluation, emphasizing the importance of considering market value and applicable rules in the valuation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 216 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70601</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and directing a revaluation of the shares for wealth tax assessment in accordance with the law. The Commissioner found the valuation adopted by the assessee to be prejudicial to the interest of revenue and directed the Wealth Tax Officer to revalue the shares. The Tribunal agreed that the Commissioner had valid jurisdiction to order the revaluation, emphasizing the importance of considering market value and applicable rules in the valuation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>