<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 106 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70586</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed both appeals filed by the firm. The ITAT upheld the appellate authority&#039;s findings that discrepancies in sales figures were due to differing accounting methods, not sales suppression. Additionally, the denial of firm registration was deemed unwarranted as there was no concrete evidence of undisclosed profits. The ITAT emphasized that incorrect accounting methods did not imply unaccounted profits and rejected the department&#039;s plea for registration reconsideration. Consequently, the firm&#039;s challenges against the Income Tax Officer&#039;s estimations and registration denial were both dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:50:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 106 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70586</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed both appeals filed by the firm. The ITAT upheld the appellate authority&#039;s findings that discrepancies in sales figures were due to differing accounting methods, not sales suppression. Additionally, the denial of firm registration was deemed unwarranted as there was no concrete evidence of undisclosed profits. The ITAT emphasized that incorrect accounting methods did not imply unaccounted profits and rejected the department&#039;s plea for registration reconsideration. Consequently, the firm&#039;s challenges against the Income Tax Officer&#039;s estimations and registration denial were both dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>