<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 104 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70582</link>
    <description>Sur-tax was treated as not deductible in computing business profits, so that claim was disallowed. The Tribunal also held that trade dues from four sick mills had become irrecoverable by the relevant accounting date, as their liabilities far exceeded assets and later takeover under sick textile legislation confirmed the financial collapse. On that basis, the amount was regarded as a bad and doubtful debt, and the deduction was allowed for the year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:44:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 104 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70582</link>
      <description>Sur-tax was treated as not deductible in computing business profits, so that claim was disallowed. The Tribunal also held that trade dues from four sick mills had become irrecoverable by the relevant accounting date, as their liabilities far exceeded assets and later takeover under sick textile legislation confirmed the financial collapse. On that basis, the amount was regarded as a bad and doubtful debt, and the deduction was allowed for the year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>