<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 153 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Section 40A(8) of the IT Act should only apply prospectively to interest incurred after 1st April 1976. As the expenditure in question was paid before that date, the disallowance was deemed unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, reversing the disallowance of Rs. 37,427 and directing the ITO to recalculate the income accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:42:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 153 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Section 40A(8) of the IT Act should only apply prospectively to interest incurred after 1st April 1976. As the expenditure in question was paid before that date, the disallowance was deemed unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, reversing the disallowance of Rs. 37,427 and directing the ITO to recalculate the income accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>