<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 254 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment completed within the extended limitation period under the Income Tax Act was valid. Non-issuance of notice under Section 143(2) for block assessment was deemed a curable irregularity, not nullity. The issue of the difference between nomination and appointment was dismissed. The challenge to the jurisdiction and validity of the warrant was dismissed based on clarification. The Tribunal ruled that all legal heirs must be included in the assessment of a deceased person, setting aside the assessment to rectify the irregularity. Appeals were dismissed and allowed for procedural irregularities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:30:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 254 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment completed within the extended limitation period under the Income Tax Act was valid. Non-issuance of notice under Section 143(2) for block assessment was deemed a curable irregularity, not nullity. The issue of the difference between nomination and appointment was dismissed. The challenge to the jurisdiction and validity of the warrant was dismissed based on clarification. The Tribunal ruled that all legal heirs must be included in the assessment of a deceased person, setting aside the assessment to rectify the irregularity. Appeals were dismissed and allowed for procedural irregularities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>