<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 256 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70574</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals of the assessee, confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) who had dismissed the appeals as withdrawn by the assessee&#039;s counsel. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority can permit withdrawal if the opposite party does not object, and in this case, the Revenue did not object. The Tribunal emphasized the public interest aspect and the need to prevent under-assessment. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed, and the order of the CIT (Appeals) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:26:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 256 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70574</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals of the assessee, confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) who had dismissed the appeals as withdrawn by the assessee&#039;s counsel. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority can permit withdrawal if the opposite party does not object, and in this case, the Revenue did not object. The Tribunal emphasized the public interest aspect and the need to prevent under-assessment. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed, and the order of the CIT (Appeals) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>