<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 209 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Commr.(A)], ruling that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147(a) of the IT Act was not validly initiated. The general statements from hundi bankers did not directly implicate the assessee, and a settlement petition filed by the assessee did not admit to bogus hundi loans. Therefore, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 209 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Commr.(A)], ruling that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147(a) of the IT Act was not validly initiated. The general statements from hundi bankers did not directly implicate the assessee, and a settlement petition filed by the assessee did not admit to bogus hundi loans. Therefore, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>