<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 104 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70567</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, permitting the foreign collaboration fee as a revenue expenditure while rejecting the gratuity provision deduction and the claim for traveling expenses. The matter of development rebate percentage was referred back to the ITO for reconsideration, maintaining consistency with previous assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:13:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 104 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70567</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, permitting the foreign collaboration fee as a revenue expenditure while rejecting the gratuity provision deduction and the claim for traveling expenses. The matter of development rebate percentage was referred back to the ITO for reconsideration, maintaining consistency with previous assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>