<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 131 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70566</link>
    <description>Dividend income from shares held as business assets by a co-operative banking society was treated as attributable to its banking business because the investments were made in the course of, and incidental to, banking operations; the broader expression &quot;attributable to&quot; in section 80P(2)(a)(i) permitted deduction even where the income was assessed under another head. By contrast, a grievance confined to non-grant of interest on delayed refund was not appealable, as the Income-tax Act did not provide a specific appellate remedy for that complaint. The assessee therefore succeeded on the dividend-income issue but failed on the refund-interest issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:10:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 131 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70566</link>
      <description>Dividend income from shares held as business assets by a co-operative banking society was treated as attributable to its banking business because the investments were made in the course of, and incidental to, banking operations; the broader expression &quot;attributable to&quot; in section 80P(2)(a)(i) permitted deduction even where the income was assessed under another head. By contrast, a grievance confined to non-grant of interest on delayed refund was not appealable, as the Income-tax Act did not provide a specific appellate remedy for that complaint. The assessee therefore succeeded on the dividend-income issue but failed on the refund-interest issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>