<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 122 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70551</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of including machinery under installation in the capital employed for relief under s. 80J. However, the deduction under s. 80M was denied due to a nil gross total income, as deductions under Chapter VI-A cannot exceed the gross total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:49:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 122 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70551</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of including machinery under installation in the capital employed for relief under s. 80J. However, the deduction under s. 80M was denied due to a nil gross total income, as deductions under Chapter VI-A cannot exceed the gross total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>