<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 99 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70550</link>
    <description>A transfer prohibited by Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Act, 1961 was treated as void ab initio, so no property passed under the deed for gift-tax purposes. The authorised officer&#039;s declaration was only procedural and did not create the invalidity. On that basis, the transaction dated 24 February 1970 could not constitute a valid gift, and its value was excluded from gift-tax liability in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:48:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 99 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70550</link>
      <description>A transfer prohibited by Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms Act, 1961 was treated as void ab initio, so no property passed under the deed for gift-tax purposes. The authorised officer&#039;s declaration was only procedural and did not create the invalidity. On that basis, the transaction dated 24 February 1970 could not constitute a valid gift, and its value was excluded from gift-tax liability in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>