<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 148 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow the deduction of retrenchment compensation for the assessment year 1974-75 under the IT Act 1961. Despite the business activities continuing post liquidation, the compensation was deemed not incurred for profit-making purposes but rather to facilitate an early closure with minimal financial impact. The Tribunal found that the compensation was not essential for maximizing returns from the business carried on by the Liquidator. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 148 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to disallow the deduction of retrenchment compensation for the assessment year 1974-75 under the IT Act 1961. Despite the business activities continuing post liquidation, the compensation was deemed not incurred for profit-making purposes but rather to facilitate an early closure with minimal financial impact. The Tribunal found that the compensation was not essential for maximizing returns from the business carried on by the Liquidator. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>