<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the concessional loans provided to employees were not taxable as perquisites under Section 17(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the appellants were deemed eligible for relief under Section 80L for the interest received from the Provident Fund. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to determine the specific relief under Section 80L in accordance with this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:59:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the concessional loans provided to employees were not taxable as perquisites under Section 17(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the appellants were deemed eligible for relief under Section 80L for the interest received from the Provident Fund. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to determine the specific relief under Section 80L in accordance with this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>