<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (5) TMI 72 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that assessments made following IAC&#039;s directions cannot be revised by the CIT under section 263, citing previous decisions and statutory merger principles. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s order deficient as it lacked clear findings on contested items and failed to address objections raised by the assessee, leading to a lack of proper consideration. The CIT&#039;s failure to evaluate objections rendered the decision-making process flawed, contributing to the order&#039;s invalidity. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the allegation of hasty assessments, emphasizing the assessments were conducted following due procedures. The Tribunal canceled the CIT&#039;s order due to the improper delegation of discretion to the IAC, compromising the CIT&#039;s independent evaluation role.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:58:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (5) TMI 72 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that assessments made following IAC&#039;s directions cannot be revised by the CIT under section 263, citing previous decisions and statutory merger principles. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s order deficient as it lacked clear findings on contested items and failed to address objections raised by the assessee, leading to a lack of proper consideration. The CIT&#039;s failure to evaluate objections rendered the decision-making process flawed, contributing to the order&#039;s invalidity. Additionally, the Tribunal dismissed the allegation of hasty assessments, emphasizing the assessments were conducted following due procedures. The Tribunal canceled the CIT&#039;s order due to the improper delegation of discretion to the IAC, compromising the CIT&#039;s independent evaluation role.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>